DRAFT TRACKER 2026

Kpeenu leans on physicality and yards after contact over elusiveness, burst or speed. His 28 bench-press reps at his pro day speak to the natural power he carries. It shows in the way he’s able to deny tacklers through force and keep his legs moving, especially near the goal line. He’s a linear runner lacking ideal bend, acceleration and top-end speed, so most of his yardage as a pro would be gained between the tackles. Kpeenu will likely need to prove himself on special teams to compete for a roster spot in camp.

Morton is a challenging evaluation given his injury history, but I studied his tape from 2024 and 2025 for my analysis here. He appears to lack the functional arm talent to push the ball into windows or beat safeties over the top into sideline buckets. He’s average with his anticipation and field-reading but is willing to get through progressions while trusting his pocket. He’s extremely tough and has the desired level of competitive spirit needed for the position. He can buy time for his receivers when needed and gets what he can when it’s time to run. Morton’s medicals will be critical, but it will likely be an uphill battle for him to make a roster.

Fifth-year senior with the height/weight/speed numbers to get a look from the slot despite just a single season of major production. Boyd uses his hands and separation burst to create an opening for his quarterback. He’s unpolished and inefficient as a route-runner but has some potential in that area. While he has deep-ball value when that branch of the route tree is utilized, average hands and below-average ball skills when contested could set him back as he pursues a roster spot.

Fleischmann is a developmental prospect with above-average athleticism but below-average size and production. He doesn’t always play to his speed but that could change if he can find more reps. He can catch in traffic and through contact but needs to work on route fundamentals to better uncover. Fleischmann probably doesn’t have enough tape to warrant a draft pick, but a team might take a flier on his upside as a practice-squad project.

After a quiet first three seasons (2022 at USC, 2023-2024 at Wisconsin) Williams broke out at Stanford in 2025. He has good size and above-average play strength. He lacks burst to bypass press and separate at break points but benefits from excellent focus and catch strength when contested. Williams runs routes with consistent play speed but will need to improve his separation tactics to make it in the league.

Barnett is a three-year starter with NFL-caliber measurables and slightly above-average athletic testing. He’s rarely cheated when he lands on contact cleanly, but he needs to improve his balance and footwork when fitting up his blocks. He appears best suited for inside-zone and gap-scheme assignments but has plenty of experience in wide zone. Barnett’s grip strength works in his favor in pass protection but he will struggle to stay mirrored to NFL rushers who attack edge to edge. While he checks some of the boxes needed to compete for a roster spot, Barnett will need to extend his aggression through the whistle as a block finisher at the next level.

Sixth-year senior whose immediate value will rest in his ability as a return man. Lacy is short and relatively compact. He has good speed and plus athleticism, but he runs unfocused routes, which limits his separation potential. While he has the speed to work all three levels, a lack of ball skills diminishes his success rate down the field. His return talent and gadget potential (jet sweeps/screens) could be enough to land him a role, but his route-running and ball skills might need sharpening to keep it.

Hilton has build-up speed to take the top off defenses, averaging 19 yards per catch during his career. He had a troubling lack of production, though, making just 41 catches in five seasons. There are basic route corrections he can make to better open underneath throws. He has adequate ball skills downfield but comes up empty when contested. When you combine his sparse production with his injury history, it doesn’t inspire confidence, but speed sells, giving Hilton a chance to outplay his draft slotting.

Blay is a slightly undersized nose tackle who climbed from Division II to Conference USA and finally to Miami, where he played for a national title. He takes on single blocks with adequate power to press and separate, but he can be wiped out by double-teams or angle pressure. He’s quick to close the distance on quarterbacks when he gets some breathing room but lacks early explosion and hand work to quickly open doors. Blay’s path to a roster might come as an undrafted free agent.

Three-year starter with a long wingspan but inconsistencies in his game and a lack of standout production. Eastern plays with loose upper-body movement that helps him slip blocks and find gaps. He uses his length effectively to disengage when he times it right. However, his high-cut frame and below-average pad level create persistent issues anchoring and maintaining gap integrity, especially against zone blocks. He ends up on the ground too often and hasn’t proven he can create consistent pressure as a rusher. Eastern’s size and length might be best utilized in a wider alignment as an odd-front end.

A seventh-year senior, Voisin displays good balance and footwork as a route-runner. He’s unable to outrun quality coverage as a vertical threat and lacks the catch radius/contested-catch talent to win when crowded. While he did a nice job during Senior Bowl practices, Voisin’s age and lack of size/speed create a massive hill to climb as he pursues a roster spot.

O'Neill is a high-motor edge defender with terrific play strength. He uses efficient hand work in tight quarters to work around blocks at the point of attack, but he lacks range in pursuit. As a pass rusher, he relies on effort and strength, with room for growth in his rush plan/execution. His lack of explosiveness and length caps his overall rush potential, though. O'Neill projects as a viable backup outside linebacker in an odd-front scheme and offers core special-teams value.

DiGiorgio has good size, but he will need to play full-time at guard to have a chance due to his athletic limitations. He has no issues with toughness. He’s able to play with some force but he’s unable to fit up and stay connected against moving targets. Issues with body control and foot quickness might be too tall a hill to climb unless he can perfect his technique and play in power rushing attacks.

Rangy former safety still in the infant stages of learning the off-ball linebacker spot. Dugger has a stretched-out frame with exceptional length and room to add more muscle throughout. He’s inconsistent when it comes to diagnosing blocking schemes/play designs and needs significant work with block take-ons inside the box. He has the speed to run down wide-flowing backs and is an above-average wrap-and-finish tackler in space. The production and traits are intriguing, but Dugger needs more schooling and physical development before becoming an NFL linebacker.

Interior defender with heavy hands and a frame for additional mass. Thompson is experienced and capable of playing in even or odd fronts. Tight hips limit his bend at the point of attack, creating inconsistent leverage, but the play strength and hand usage are in place. He’ll give effort as a rusher but he lacks tools to create NFL pressure. Thompson projects as a late-round pick or undrafted free agent.

Guilbeau is an athletic perimeter cornerback, but he lacks ideal size and speed. It appears there is a disconnect between his eyes and feet, as he’s frequently late in reacting to plays he sees developing in front of him. He plays with average burst and make-up speed, so falling behind simply will not be an option on the next level. Guilbeau balances in zone from high to low and is an above-average ball-tracker in quarters and Cover 3. His lack of size shows up on 50/50 balls, though, and he lacks the aggression needed to handle the rigors of run support as a nickelback.

Gesky is a 34-game starter with adequate size, strength and length. He fails to enter run blocks with ideal pad level to leverage and displace opponents. He’s more of a positional occupier at the point. He sees pressure clearly near the line of scrimmage and is consistent with his blitz/twist pickups. He’s an average reactive athlete when beaten and needs to improve the efficiency of his punch. There are physical tools to work with, but Gesky appears to have a limited ceiling.

Sharar is a one-year starter whose production masks inconsistencies in the box. For having so few starts, he’s rarely fooled by misdirection and scrambles to recover when it gets the best of him. He lacks size/strength to play effectively through contact and hasn’t learned to slip blocks often enough. He’s a willing chance taker but subpar pursuit speed and tackle-finishing shrink his margin for error. Sharar’s best chance of making a roster will be as a special-teams star, but he’ll need to prove he’s trustworthy as a functional backup.

Hard-hat possession receiver who has delivered with consistency for three consecutive seasons. Bond shines with natural ball skills highlighted by plus catch focus and sure hands to routinely win contested catch battles. Finding separation as a pro will be a challenge. He’s not shifty enough to beat a pro press and doesn’t have the speed or suddenness to break free from sticky man coverage. He might need pre-snap motion or bunch formations to get rolling. Bond will find his best chance with teams who covet pro-caliber ball skills over separation traits.

Three-year starter with solid passing production relative to the lack of protection he saw in 2025. Altmyer has experience in pro passing concepts and shows decent eye discipline/patience to give the play a chance. He throws with adequate anticipation into zone windows but a slower operation time and lack of arm talent hurt his chances of beating tight man coverage. Edge pressure sneaks up on him and he hasn’t learned to avoid sacks often enough. Altmyer could have a tough time beating out pro backups for a roster spot.

Jones is a former five-star recruit who played at three schools (Georgia, Florida State, Oklahoma) over the last three seasons. He has good size and comes from NFL bloodlines. His play strength and aggression at the point of attack are average, but his hands stay active and he gets off blocks when needed. So far, Jones has not been able to convert his traits into high-level production. His rush plan and toolbox do not stand out on tape.

Randolph is a 38-game starter carrying a compact build and above-average power. He has a strong core and contact balance that allows him to meet strength with strength at the point. His hands stay inside and he’s consistently in a state of leverage. He has limited range, though. Longer defenders can separate and work around him for quick wins. He has trouble matching post-snap movement in the run game and edge attacks in protection. Randolph’s strength and experience are checkmarks in his favor, but there might be too many holes in his overall game right now.

Enormous collegiate right tackle who might need to prove he can bump inside to make an NFL roster. Pettus is tall and very broad but lacks the natural sit-down anchor associated with many players his size. He lacks fluidity as a pulling blocker and when fitting up run blocks off the snap. He might not have enough slide quickness to handle NFL edge speed. Even with a move to guard, Pettus will need to improve his body control and footwork to effectively utilize his size.

Productive edge defender and 42-game starter over five seasons at Central Michigan. NFL teams will take notice of Heldman’s 2025 spike in TFLs/sacks and his size/testing profile. He’s well-built and can hold his own against single blocks at the point of attack. However, he’s inconsistent with early play recognition and initial footwork to beat the block. He’s strong on the edges of his rush but lacks ideal fluidity/bend in his lower half and has a fairly predictable rush menu. Heldman could earn an opportunity to compete in a camp thanks to his size, testing and 2025 production.

A versatile slot receiver, Wortham can run, catch, throw, and return kicks, though he lacks elite size and explosiveness. He has good hands but needs to improve in altering route tempo and hiding break points from the coverage. Wortham, who played quarterback in high school, is capable of being used in Wildcat looks, zone-read concepts and quick-game throws or gadget passes. He can return kicks but is an average threat in that department. His versatility stands out, but convincing a team he’s a plus in any one area will be the key to making a legitimate push for a spot in camp.

Bamba is a perimeter cornerback with impressive size, elite top-end speed and good short-area burst. Despite his advantageous measurables and explosiveness, he comes up short with on-ball production due to his lack of coverage feel and instincts. Bamba has struggled to stay connected to receivers and needs more technique work. Teams might want to develop him as a press-man corner, but he appears to be better suited for work as a zone corner who can press, redirect and play the run. Bamba is a project, but he could find a practice squad.

Voorhis is a little undersized and not very long, but he posted impact production in the FBS for the first time in 2025. He’s fairly instinctive as a rusher and made noticeable additions to his rush menu last season. While he collected tackles for loss in 2025, he’s below average at beating run blocks and securing his gaps. He lacks traits, explosive testing and sustained production but his consistency as a rusher is worth keeping an eye on.

Two-year starter with NFL-caliber measurables. Kelly needs to get stronger and play with better grit to leverage his gap and win individual block battles in run support. Improved hand usage and refined counters might bolster his chances of creating pressure, but it’s hard to envision much sack production given his lack of quickness and explosive power. Kelly will have to battle for a roster spot as an even-front end.

Free safety or zone nickelback who showed impressive instincts/ball skills on tape but tested poorly at his pro day. Dunnam displays good anticipation and recognition of play design both pre- and post-snap. He can break simultaneously with wideouts and close on intended targets before the quarterback starts his throwing motion. He lacks top-end speed and is missing size/consistency as a run defender/open-field tackler. Dunnam will need to prove himself as a functional zone defender to compete for a roster spot.

Towering four-year starter at tackle who struggles with leverage. Mahlman’s lack of length contributes to protection breakdowns when he fails to land first hands. As a run blocker, he uses hand strikes to mitigate a lack of bend but he doesn’t have the body control to execute from entry to whistle at a consistent level. It’s tough for tall tackles to bump inside to guard, but such a move might provide Mahlman his best shot at a roster spot, provided he adds to his core strength.

Brinson is a field-stretcher, but the middle of his route tree is missing branches. He’s a long-strider with good acceleration to build speed and create opportunities for himself on vertical routes. His route-running is less effective on intermediate routes, where he’s slower in and out of breaks. Despite his catch radius and hand size, he wins fewer 50/50 balls than he should when coverage closes him down. Brinson has traits to work with but offers a more limited menu of services for teams.

Developmental offensive lineman whose inconsistencies could begin to correct themselves with more technique work and experience. Mosesso needs to add mass but carries an NFL frame with good lean mass. His athletic ability, hand strength and contact pop are elements that create projection potential at either tackle or guard. He seems to lack instincts/understanding of how to get to his actions with proper footwork and positioning at this juncture. Mosesso’s issues appear to be correctable with better technique, so a team willing to play the long game with him could benefit in the future.

Former five-star recruit with good length and athletic ability but inconsistencies that could hurt his chances on the next level. Leigh has the footwork and hand-timing for protection success in the early stages of the rep but struggles anchoring against power. He gets into trouble with excessive lunging. He’s quick out of his stance and is able to hit lateral/second-level landmarks but his lack of sustain strength will be hard for him to overcome as a run blocker.

Long-limbed edge defender with intriguing rush features but a lack of anchor and contact balance against the run. Anthony is best when playing up the field with elusiveness in both phases. He has adequate get-off with long strides and good bend in his rush. He can throw speed and angle changes at tackles to create opportunities but it’s all for naught once tackles get hands on him. He’s unable to withstand heads-up battles at the point and has average pursuit speed/short-area agility as a tackler. Anthony projects as a developmental pass rusher with practice-squad potential.

Off-ball linebacker with average size and one season as a full-time starter over five years. Weeks is an average athlete, but he has pretty good linear speed. He has adequate reaction time in his diagnosis. He’s a thumper when he catches runners cleanly but struggles to alter pursuit paths and change direction fluidly in space. Issues in coverage and with tackle consistency could linger, which might work against him as teams weigh his special teams value.

Athletic Will linebacker with inconsistencies in his game that might hinder his projection as a pro. Sorey can read and recognize run-play development. He’s capable as a run-and-chase linebacker but his missed tackle totals are alarming. He struggles to take on blocks and maintain run fits near the line. He has issues with coverage busts and a lack of awareness in zone drops. Sorey’s athletic profile should garner attention, but a lack of consistent execution in the fundamentals could be a tough challenge to overcome.

Anderson is a short but stocky slot receiver with good speed but below-average hands. Injuries and quarterback play slowed his production in 2025, so a heavier dose of 2024 tape is needed for his evaluation. His routes are rhythmic and fairly disciplined, but he fails to create enough separation from his break points. He has the play strength to compete for the contested throws he’s likely to see against tight press man. Anderson has the talent and toughness NFL teams like to see, but his lack of size/explosiveness could make it challenging for him to earn a spot as a backup.

Two-year starter with consistent production in the key categories. Graves lacks NFL-caliber size, length and athletic-testing numbers, but he fills stat columns, using hustle and know-how to find the action. He finished his career with an impressive sack total (16.5) but he’s not a consistent quick-win rusher and those numbers are unlikely to translate. He struggles to hold his ground against double-teams/angle pressure as a run defender, while his lack of length hurts his consistency with block shed and tackling.

Sharp converted from quarterback to tight end at Southeastern Louisiana in 2022 before heading to Oklahoma (2024) and then to LSU (2025). He has some separation burst underneath but tends to fight the football and lacks consistency finishing through contact. He’s short-armed and slow to snap his hands into run blocks, allowing defenders to land first and quickly separate. He’s willing at the point but lacks core strength and is better suited to block on the move. He will have to shine in camp to have a chance to stick on a roster.

Experienced starting tackle missing the length and foot quickness to stay outside on the next level. Adams carries girthy lowers with good leg drive and adequate hand usage in the run game. A lack of body control creates inconsistency in fitting blocks, but when he’s in, he can get some work done. His pass protection has major holes with below-average anchor and mirror quickness. Adams could find his way into camp but faces a steep climb to make a squad.

Size, speed and production are check marks in Rucker’s favor. He has good straight-line speed but is average as a route-runner and well below average when it’s time to finish catches. I did not see a lot of improvement from him as a ball-winner over the course of six seasons. While he possesses intriguing talent, it’s hard to imagine Rucker building camp momentum given his inconsistency when it comes to reeling in throws.

Possession receiver with limited range and explosiveness to threaten NFL corners. Key is a detail-oriented route-runner with natural ball skills and soft hands. However, he struggles to beat press, lacks the vertical speed to push cornerbacks onto their heels and is unable to prevent a high rate of contested looks. Key’s best shot will be as a big slot receiver working as a zone-beater, but a lack of special-teams value shrinks his roster chances.

Good tester with average size and steady production over the last three seasons. Connors typically gains what is blocked for him, but he can be indecisive without a clear entry point and lacks above-average elusiveness in space. Connors has decent burst once he hits the gas and builds to top speed quickly to eliminate tackle angles toward the perimeter. His receiving totals are primarily a function of leak-out catches and swing passes. Connors is steady and reliable but will need to carve out a clearly defined role to stick on an NFL roster.

Big, tough wideout with modest production and average tools. McCulley has adequate foot quickness and athleticism. However, he will need to prove he can beat tight man pressure because he’s not a natural separator and rarely runs by cornerbacks on vertical routes. He works back on throws when needed and uses his frame/hand extension to help him protect the catch-point. His performance in the catch phase is a plus, but getting there won’t be easy for him against NFL cornerbacks.

Hunter’s productive 2025 season featured 102 tackles, including 14 for loss and four sacks. He’s fast when he opens up and runs but can be a little leggy with his short-area movements. Hunter’s instincts and response quickness are a little below average and he’s not suited for third-down coverage duties at the next level. His athletic testing was outstanding and he can compete for a role on special teams, but he’ll need to show he can handle backup linebacker duties to have a chance of sticking on a roster.

Rubio possesses a good blend of size, length and strength to play as an odd-front defensive end, but his production is lacking. He has some anchor at the point of attack and plays with efficient, heavy hands on contact. A lack of pass-rush talent means he will need to shine as a run defender to make a team.

Dingle offers a height/weight/speed option at inside linebacker. He’s a three-year starter who often relies on athleticism over instincts. His overall production in the impact categories is relatively light and he’s below average in coverage. The size, athletic testing and play strength are all positives, but Dingle is lacking in snap-to-snap execution, production and three-down versatility.

Kuwatch is a fifth-year senior who had only 14 career tackles before a 2025 breakout season (109 tackles, 10 TFLs, 5 sacks). He has good size and tested well at his pro day but lacks fluid on-field athleticism. His limited experience shows up in his need for improved block take-ons, but he does have a feel for finding running backs. Kuwatch has a chance to make some noise in camp and could compete for a practice squad spot.

Stroman is an aggressive player who might need to star on special teams to make a squad. He can handle some man coverage but struggles on the back end, where technique and route recognition are not his strong suits. He needs to play with more patience on downhill run fills but he strikes ball-carriers with force. He fits as a “robber” where he can play forward against short throws and race in against the run. He has immediate special teams value and elements of his game on defense might be worth continued development.

Bradley struggles to play through route contact and lacks footwork/short-area burst as a route-runner. He’s primarily a zone-beater underneath with value as a long target in the red zone. His athleticism will become a plus with a position change from wide receiver to tight end, but he’s not much of a blocker right now. Bradley will need to prove he can uncover at a better clip for consideration as a pass-catching tight end in the league.