DRAFT TRACKER 2025

Massive nose tackle whose lack of productivity belies his potential to imprint on NFL games as a run defender. Jackson is a complete non-factor as a rusher, so his spot on a draft board will be relative to a team’s willingness to take a two-down player in need of polish. He’s long and plays with extremely heavy hands and an ability to overwhelm single blockers at times. When he’s allowed to swap paint and focus on smaller areas of containment, he’s a tough out. He gets knocked off his spot more than he should, but better block take-on and technique should create better consistency. Jackson has freakish size and is a more enticing prospect when tape flashes are prioritized in the evaluation process.

Martin is a banger at inside linebacker. He’s been a consistent tackle collector over the last three seasons, playing with the violence and instincts teams look for inside. He’s sturdy enough to take on blocks and clog his run fits. His lack of length shows up at times as a tackler and he will lose some ground in pursuit when runs spill wide. He’s capable as a blitzer but was almost never asked to cover man-to-man at Memphis. Martin has the intensity, production and play strength to fit as a two-down backup and special-teams contributor.

Cornerback whose lack of top-end speed could push him into more of a full-time role in the slot. Minor has had some hamstring issues, which might have contributed to him flying under the radar. Also, his lack of impressive athletic testing numbers and on-ball production didn’t help. He will need to prove he can handle NFL coverage responsibilities and he’ll need to stand out for his run support if he’s going to make an NFL roster.

Prieskorn has the size and frame of an in-line tight end, but he lacks the grit and blocking ability to man that spot in the NFL right now. Most of his catch production came from scheme or zone beaters. He’s sluggish into his routes and lacks the separation talent to get open against NFL man coverage. As a run blocker, he can neutralize more passive defenders but struggles with opponents who are aggressive and strong. He has quality ball skills but the blocking and aggression will need to pick up to warrant a roster spot.

Productive four-year starter with a long, wiry build and hands on the small side. Henigan displayed an adequate feel for the offense, but it never really felt like he was taking a scalpel to fairly average defenses. He’s not a commanding thrower and lacks arm talent on the move. He has adequate mobility inside the pocket and throws with accuracy to his first option when he’s on-platform, but his feet get impatient when getting through progressions. On paper, his accuracy intermediate and deep are below average, but on tape, he simply didn’t have receivers who could separate and create better passing windows. The production has been solid and he’s worth a look as a potential backup.

Sixth-year senior who made stops at three different schools during his career. While Anderson was a productive college running back, he doesn’t appear to play fast enough to stay a step ahead of NFL defenses. He lacks the quickness, speed and creativity to find yardage on his own. He runs with toughness and can get what is blocked but appears to be lacking the dynamic qualities needed to be a productive NFL backup.

Taylor is a good-looking wideout with proportional size and length, but there might not be enough ingredients to bake the cake. He’s frequently rerouted or flat-out stalled by press and will see a high percentage of his targets contested due to a lack of separation quickness. He can box out defenders underneath and will win an adequate number of contested-catch battles. A miserable touchdown rate of one for every 23 catches is indicative of a lack of functional playmaking potential.