NEW ORLEANS -- Three players fighting suspensions from the NFL's bounty investigation have told a federal judge they are comfortable with their representation by union lawyers and see no potential conflict of interest in the arrangement.
The players' written comments on Thursday came in response to an order a day earlier by U.S. District Judge Ginger Berrigan, who lamented the failure of settlement talks and wrote that she was concerned there were competing agendas among lawyers on all sides in the dispute that were undermining the interests of the players.
The NFLPA also filed a response in which it explained that it has been seeking to engage league lawyers in settlement talks, "and the NFL continued to refuse to do so, never making a single settlement offer to the Players."
The union added that it also sees no conflict in representing the players, but will help them get their own attorneys if the court desires.
The NFLPA, the three players, and Saints linebacker Jonathan Vilma (who has his own attorney) are claiming in their consolidated lawsuits that Commissioner Roger Goodell abused his authority and followed improper procedures in disciplining the players for a program that, according to NFL investigators, paid improper cash bonuses for hits that injured opponents. The lawsuit seeks to have the punishment handed down by Goodell thrown out.
Breer: Week 1 picks
Albert Breer provides his predictions for the opening week of the season, giving one rookie quarterback a road win. More ...
Vilma was suspended for the entire season, Hargrove for eight games, Smith for four games and Fujita three games.
Earlier this week, the NFLPA asked for a temporary restraining order that would allow the three players it represents to rejoin their clubs while the case proceeds. Vilma made the same request in July, and Berrigan has yet to rule on either request, but could potentially do so before the Saints and Browns open the regular season on Sunday.
Berrigan ordered the NFL to respond by Thursday to the union's request for a temporary restraining order on behalf of the three players it represents in the case. The league complied, stating that it opposes the NFLPA's TRO request for the same reason it opposed a similar request by Vilma.
Those reasons included NFL arguments that Berrigan did not have jurisdiction over the matter because the league's labor agreement was collectively bargained. NFL attorneys also have argued that granting a restraining order would motivate more players to bring similar frivolous requests to the courts in an effort to delay punishment in subsequent disciplinary matters.
Copyright 2012 by The Associated Press