NFL lawyers filed a motion in U.S. District Court in New Orleans on Friday, arguing that former NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue should be allowed to hear appeals on the Saints' bounties case next week.
Jeremiah: Key matchups in Week 8
Daniel Jeremiah identifies five enticing battles to follow in Week 8, including DeSean Jackson vs. Asante Samuel. More ...
In their motion, NFL lawyers quote defendant Jonathan Vilma's statement to ESPN in which he supported Tagliabue being appointed to the role, saying "I think it's a good first step for Paul to be the neutral arbitrator."
NFL lawyers wrote that, "Mr. Vilma was right that Commissioner Tagliabue was a good appointment.
"Commissioner Tagliabue has the experience necessary to assess whether the conduct the players engaged in was detrimental to the League and, if so, to assess the propriety of the discipline that Commissioner Goodell imposed. It is difficult to think of anyone else more qualified."
The action comes after the players' union and the four players suspended in the case filed a motion asking that Tagliabue recuse himself because of what they say is a conflict of interest. They want a neutral arbitrator to be appointed by the court.
NFL lawyers argue that the NFL Players Association has no basis to accuse Tagliabue of "anything nefarious," saying the players' union itself admitted that Tagliabue has not had any "personal involvement in the investigation, arbitration or litigation of the 'bounty' matter."
The hearings are scheduled for Tuesday, subject to any rulings.
Vilma received the stiffest suspension of the four -- ruled out for the entire season -- but he played last Sunday while the appeals process is in motion.
The union also contends that pay-for-hits programs such as the one the NFL says operated in New Orleans existed when Tagliabue was commissioner, with his knowledge.
Copyright 2012 by The Associated Press