LOS ANGELES -- City negotiators on a deal to build an NFL stadium in downtown Los Angeles told council members Wednesday that they're convinced taxpayers wouldn't be on the hook if the project runs into financial difficulties.
Chief legislative analyst Gerry Miller said at a meeting of a special council stadium committee that his team negotiated a deal that shifts risk entirely onto the stadium's planner, Anschutz Entertainment Group.
"I cannot envision a reasonable scenario where there's a hit to the city treasury," Miller said.
Negotiators released a non-binding memorandum of understanding this week on the deal to relocate a convention center building to make space for the proposed 72,000 seat venue with a retractable roof, which is expected to cost some $1.2 billion.
It calls for the issuance of $275 million in tax-exempt bonds to move the building and for that cash to be repaid with lease payments, property taxes and other new project-related revenue.
AEG agreed in the proposed framework to break $80 million of the $275 million in debt into a special type of bond that is financed with a tax on its nearby properties such as Staples Center and the LA Live entertainment complex and puts the facilities on the line if the company doesn't pay.
The agreement also requires AEG to extend a series of financial guarantees over the course of the project as a safeguard against shortfalls and other risks.
Council members are expected to vote on the agreement in the coming weeks. If endorsed, they will later vote on separate definitive stadium-related agreements, such as its development and financing deals and its clearance under state environmental regulations.
Warehouse magnate Ed Roski's Majestic Realty Co. has permits in place to build a separate 75,000-seat stadium about 15 miles east of Los Angeles, in the city of Industry.
Neither proposed site has secured a team.
At Wednesday's hearing, officials also appeared to dash hopes previously expressed by councilman Bill Rosendahl that the city may get a cut of AEG's reported $700 million naming-rights deal with Farmers Insurance Exchange.
Bill Rhoda, a private consultant who helped city negotiators with the agreement, noted that AEG is expected to realize a 6.7 percent return on its investment in the project -- far less than any comparable pro-football deal -- after expenses such as building a stadium and securing a team, so it needs the full naming rights payout to make the arrangement pencil out.
One of among the dozen or so speakers to offer comment toward the end of the hearing, Rhoda said he was concerned that officials, who estimated that the deal would mean a $410 million net gain to city coffers over 30 years, were exaggerating the projects' benefit to taxpayers.
Victor Citrin, who lives near the project site, said that officials' rosy calculations include room taxes paid by guests at hotels that separate developers are expected to build to serve visitors to the stadium and newly enlarged convention center.
He noted, however, that several new hotel projects have been exempted from paying room taxes as a development incentive, so there's no reason to believe these new hotels wouldn't also get a pass.
"All these hotel rooms are not going to generate any hotel tax," he said.