Skip to main content

Niners acquire Jimmy Garoppolo in trade with Patriots

We have our whopper trade of 2017.

The New England Patriots have traded quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo to the San Francisco 49ers for a 2018 second-round pick, the 49ers announced on Tuesday.

ESPN first reported the development.

In a corresponding move, the 49ers informed quarterback (and former Patriots backup) Brian Hoyer of his release, Rapoport reported. Hoyer was originally included in the Garoppolo deal, but was taken out of the deal because of compensatory pick reasons, Rapoport added. The Patriots will now need to add a quarterback to their roster to backup Tom Brady after trading away Jacoby Brissett, and now Garoppolo -- Hoyer could be a potential option.

"He was a great teammate and a great friend. Always will be," Brady said on Westwood One with Jim Gray on Monday night. "I mean, he's put in all the effort. I've watched him for the three and half years and really enjoyed working with him and hopefully he goes on and does a great job."

New England was facing a situation in which it wouldn't be able to keep Brady (for his age-41 season and however longer) and Garoppolo, with the backup heading for free agency in 2018 with a market desperate for anything average or better under center. Brady has done plenty over the years to restructure his contract to make New England's cap situation more flexible for winning, but there's nothing he could do to fit the type of contract Garoppolo is going to get from someone.

Who's that someone? The Cleveland Browns (get out the tissues again before you read this, Browns fans), perhaps the New York Jets, and yes, the San Francisco 49ers. General manager John Lynch just got a jump on attempting to re-sign Garoppolo, and nine weeks to see how he'll fit with his team.

Rapoport reported Tuesday, the 49ers will try to extend Garoppolo, but an extension was not part of the deal, according to sources informed of the team's plans. However, nothing is imminent.

So what are the Niners getting in Garoppolo? The signal-caller has long held the great card of temptation -- potential -- for those clubs envious of New England's quarterback situation. Garoppolo has seen very limited action, with his most notable playing time coming during Brady's four-game suspension at the start of the 2016 season, in which the backup started two games and only made it through five and a half quarters before being knocked out by injury.

During that stretch, Garoppolo showed flashes of potential future success, completing 24 of 33 passes for 264 yards and one touchdown in a win over Arizona, and 18 of 26 passes for 232 yards and three, count them, three touchdowns in the Week 2 game against Miami. The small amount of tape made those aforementioned teams salivate. It also made San Francisco send a second-round pick to New England for him.

The trade deadline looms, so that can explain the timing. New England has made it through the first games with just two losses, meaning the Patriots will be in contention down the stretch and don't necessarily need the insurance of Garoppolo. From their standpoint, they got a reliable backup they rarely needed to turn to out of their second-round pick spent on him in 2014, and basically exchanged him for a new second-rounder to spend this offseason. Not a bad deal.

As for the Niners, this means the end of the C.J. Beathard era is mercilessly near (sorry, Beathard fans). What will be interesting is how Kyle Shanahan uses Garoppolo. San Francisco is 0-8, and has an offensive line that struggled mightily to protect Beathard in a loss to Philadelphia in Week 8. It seems they'd be wise to keep Garoppolo on ice for a couple of weeks and ease him into the system, but crazier things have happened. Plus, with the immediate excitement shot in the arms of Niners fans, Shanahan might be pressured to cave for the calls for the new savior before too long. Additionally, San Francisco needs to see what they have in their acquisition. This situation is actually a bit more delicate than initially thought.

This article has been reproduced in a new format and may be missing content or contain faulty links. Please use the Contact Us link in our site footer to report an issue.

Related Content