Labor lawyer: NFL owners like NHL's when season was lost

DALLAS -- An outside labor lawyer for the NFL said the league's owners are as unified right now as NHL owners were when hockey lost an entire season to a lockout.

"The only other time I've seen owners this unified ... was in 2004-05, in hockey, where there was also complete unity," said Bob Batterman, who worked for the NHL during its labor dispute with players.

"And I see it here. These men and women -- there are a couple of women in the room -- know what's wrong with the business today and know how it needs to be changed."

Summing up the current negotiations from the NFL's perspective, Batterman said: "It's not a revenue problem, even though revenues aren't growing as fast as they were. These folks are masters at generating revenues. The problem is at cost side. Costs have been growing faster than revenues. That's simple."

Batterman spoke after a pre-Super Bowl news conference Wednesday held by Jeff Pash, the NFL's lead in-house negotiator.

Pash reiterated many of the same points he made during a meeting with reporters at league headquarters in New York last week, saying both sides would risk hundreds of millions of dollars if a new collective bargaining agreement isn't in place by the start of the 2011 regular season.

The old CBA was agreed to in 2006, but owners exercised an opt-out clause in 2008. That deal expires at midnight March 4, and the union expects the owners to lock out players as soon as the next day.

"We think March is a pretty serious date," Pash said.

Among the key issues: how to split the roughly $9 billion in league revenues between owners and players, the league's push for an 18-game regular season, a rookie wage scale and benefits for former players.

"There is probably more common ground on a number of key issues than people may realize," Pash said, "but, obviously, the fundamental economics have to be addressed."

Also Wednesday, arbitrator Shyam Das denied a grievance by the union that sought to make teams pay health-insurance premiums for active players beyond March 3, even if there is no new CBA to replace the expiring one.

The union filed the grievance in December, saying teams should have to continue to pay for benefits through Aug. 31, when the insurance-plan year ends. The NFL argued insurance would need to paid for by the players or union without a new deal.

That decision came one day after special master Stephen Burbank rejected the union's request that $4 billion the NFL would be due from TV contracts be put in escrow if there is a lockout.

Even as Pash made the case that it's important to reach a deal sooner than later, he acknowledged that March 4 really isn't truly a hard-and-fast deadline.

"If you're making progress, you can stop the clock," Pash said. "It's not a 'Thelma & Louise'-type situation, where you just go over the cliff."

For more NFL labor news, visit

Copyright 2011 by The Associated Press

This article has been reproduced in a new format and may be missing content or contain faulty links. Please use the Contact Us link in our site footer to report an issue.