Skip to main content

Fantasy points per target analysis: Top 30 2016 WRs

Fantasy football is all about points. The more you score, the better chance you have to win.

(It ain't rocket science, folks).

While traditional scoring leader lists offer a look at how well a player did overall during a given season, it doesn't take into effect such factors as games missed and injuries. So, let's take a deeper look into the numbers to see how our heroes performed when the football was in their hands. In the case of the wide receivers, we examined how well players performed on a per target basis with notes on snap percentage as well. This exercise helps us find which wideouts did the most with their opportunities to produce points, and which ones needed lots of chances to be relevant.

Here's a look at your top 30 fantasy wide receivers from last season, ranked based on their fantasy-point-per-target averages (minimum 350 snaps).

1. Tyreek Hill, Kansas City Chiefs (1.66 FPPT): Hill's rank shouldn't be a surprise when you consider his targets (83) to the number of touchdowns he scored (nine) last season. Therein lies the concern in Hill's stock for 2017, as he'll be hard-pressed to duplicate that high ratio once again.

2. Kenny Stills, Miami Dolphins (1.56 FPPT): Stills finished 27th in fantasy points among wideouts a season ago. However, he scored nine touchdowns despite ranking third in targets (80) on his own team. In all, he was 60th in targets at his position. Kenny is "still" worth just a late pick.

3. Brandin Cooks, New Orleans Saints (1.44 FPPT): Cooks was 24th in targets among wideouts (Michael Thomas had more), but he made lots of statistical noise when he touched the football in New Orleans. This is positive news, considering his targets could decline as a member of the Patriots.

T-4. Davante Adams, Green Bay Packers (1.42 FPPT): Adams ranked seventh in fantasy points at the position on the strength of his 12 touchdowns, which tied for the third most. A regression to the mean is an obvious concern for Adams' 2017 draft value, as is the addition of Martellus Bennett.

T-4. J.J. Nelson, Arizona Cardinals (1.42 FPPT): Nelson was 68th in targets and played in just 43 percent of Arizona's snaps, but he found the end zone seven times (once as a runner) despite the number of chances he received. There's some definite sleeper appeal with Nelson for next season.

T-6. Julio Jones, Atlanta Falcons (1.37 FPPT): Jones finished with 129 targets (9.2 per game), but remember that he missed time due to a bum foot. He also had another impressive stat, finishing second among qualified wide receivers in fantasy points per snap (0.25). Jones is a first-round lock.

T-6. Jordy Nelson, Green Bay Packers (1.37 FPPT): Lots of touchdowns means a high point-per-target percentage, so it's no surprise to see Nelson (14 TDs) in the top 10 at the position. The veteran wide receiver saw 93 percent of his team's snaps and was sixth in targets among all wideouts.

T-6. Adam Thielen, Minnesota Vikings (1.37 FPPT): Thielen was second in snap percentage (75) and targets (91) behind Stefon Diggs in Minnesota last season, but he was far more productive with the ball in his hands. Of course, 26 percent of his fantasy points came in just one game (Week 16).

9. Rishard Matthews, Tennessee Titans (1.36 FPPT): Matthews was an impressive 14th in points (including nine touchdowns) among wideouts in 2016, but 30 players had more targets at the position. He did find the end zone on eight percent of his targets ... can he sustain that rate again?

T-10. Dez Bryant, Dallas Cowboys (1.35 FPPT): Bryant had a "down" season based on his high standards, but he did score a touchdown on eight percent of his targets with Dak Prescott at the helm. If he's on the field for 16 games, Bryant will be back in the top 10 among wide receivers.

Michael Fabiano is an award-winning fantasy football analyst on and NFL Network and a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association (FSWA) Hall of Fame. Have a burning question on anything fantasy related? Tweet it to _**@MichaelFabiano**_ or send a question via **Facebook**!

This article has been reproduced in a new format and may be missing content or contain faulty links. Please use the Contact Us link in our site footer to report an issue.